Public Profile

The American Council on Wild and Volunteer Foods is a nonprofit standards and advocacy body devoted to the study, classification, and responsible promotion of foods that grow without being deliberately planted — wild forage, escaped cultivars, and what the horticultural literature calls “volunteer” plants, meaning those that arrive on their own. Founded in 1971, the Council occupies an unusual position between conservation science, food policy, and what its charter describes as “the dignity of provisions no one intended.”

The Council maintains the Register of Acknowledged Wild Edibles, a continuously updated taxonomy that distinguishes between foods that are forageable (safely gatherable), technically edible (consumable but inadvisable), and present (existing in the environment but unaffiliated with any food system). The third category, added in 1994, has become the Council’s most cited contribution and the subject of frequent dispute, as it includes a great many organisms — pigeons, ornamental crabapples, the contents of decorative fountains — that the public assumes to be either food or not-food, but which the Council insists are neither until a determination is made.

The organization does not itself certify foods as organic, a point its leadership stresses with some weariness, and it has no enforcement authority. Its assessments are advisory. Nonetheless, federal agencies, municipal foraging ordinances, and at least one national park system have adopted the Council’s three-tier framework, and its annual State of Volunteer Provender report is closely read by the small community of professionals who care about such things.

The Council is led by executive director Dr. Audra Stenholm, an ethnobotanist who has run the organization since 2016.

Private Profile

The Council exists to be the careful, deflating voice in any story where someone has gotten excited about free food growing somewhere it shouldn’t. Its institutional temperament is precise, patient, and faintly exhausted — it has spent fifty years explaining that “edible” and “a food source” are not the same claim, and it expects to spend fifty more. It never mocks enthusiasm; it simply measures it and reports the yield, which is almost always lower than hoped.

The “present” category is the engine of its comedy. The Council can be relied upon to assess any sudden windfall of wild provision — a flooded field of watercress, an orchard gone feral, a reflecting pool now full of ducks — and to conclude, with full scientific seriousness, that the organisms in question are real, are there, and are enrolled in no program. It is generative for any story involving foraging, food insecurity addressed through unconventional means, or officials claiming that nature has been quietly feeding people all along.

Articles